Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

Man United FC are destroying the beautiful game.?

Bought Kagawa, Fellaini and Mata for 90 million pounds.

Bought Zaha for 15 million pounds and loaned him out. Gave a 300.000 pound pay deal to keep Rooney and become their ambassador after he retires. Now, trying to sign Kroos for another massive deal worth 250.000 per week. What the hell is happening to them? Don't they know the owners used the club as collateral to finance the club purchase? Man United are essentially in debts.

Update:

In Moyes We Trust,

You are way off... Kagawa was brought for the future, knowing Fergie is going to retire soon? That was a waste of money.

Eto'o went to Anzhi for a retirement package. That's about the only amount which could entice a player to sign for the lower leagues.

Update 2:

In Moyes We Trust,

You are way off... Kagawa was brought for the future, knowing Fergie is going to retire soon? That was a waste of money.

Eto'o went to Anzhi for a retirement package. That's about the only amount which could entice a player to sign for the lower leagues.

Update 3:

Kagawa was brought in 2012. That's a whole lot of future warming the bench.

And Ya, look at Chelsea is now, and where Man United is. Chelsea can afford to pay the sum since they are not in debts and have a proven manager and a supportive owner.

3 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago
    Favourite answer

    And they say City is destroying the game...

  • ?
    Lv 6
    7 years ago

    Kagawa was bought more for the future, under Fergie's plans. With Moyes taking over, that plan doesn't seem as likely.

    It was the same with Zaha, though going on loan isn't always a bad thing. Look at Welbeck, went on loan to Sunderland and pretty much has a solid performance every time he plays now.

    The £300k a week deal for Rooney i agree with. Don't know how many times I've said this but i had a friend serving in the armed forces, and was killed in Afghanistan, at the time of his death, he was earning £24k a year, or around that amount, so I find it sickening that these people earn so much money.

    The Kroos deal would be good however, and in some ways, worth the money. Look around the world at salaries for these players, it's not so bad compared to some. Before joining Chelsea, Eto'o was on over 400k euros a week. That's a lot more than the £250k for Kroos.

    Source(s): United Fan. Edit: Why it is a waste of money, because you say so? Many teams buy players with no intention of integrating them straight into the first team. Whether Chelsea are willing to foot Eto'o's reported £350,000-a-week salary to bring the Cameroonian to Stamford Bridge remains to be seen. http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/420406/Che... ^^ That's the link to the post. Where am I way off?
  • John
    Lv 5
    7 years ago

    you are destroying English football section sec with your absuurd questions

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.