do atheists in general have a difficult time distinquishing between "science denier" and "i dont care"?

atheist trolls aren't worth your time.

It really depends on the circumstances. If you said something like "I don't believe the world is round because the bible speaks of 'the four corners of the earth'" then I would say you are a science denier. I would assume you could not possibly be ignorant of the scientific consensus that the earth is round.

If, on the other hand, you said "I don't accept Evolution because it contradicts Genesis" you might not be aware that speciation has been observed and the copious evidence supporting Evolution since knowledge of this type is more limited. On the other hand you might simply not care - having already made up your mind and not wished to be confused with the facts.

How am I to tell the difference?

Anyway, I don't ever recall addressing you directly before now. If might help me to understand if you could give me a specific example.

Peace.

Do atheists in general have a difficult time distinquishing between "science denier" and "i dont care"?

- No, stupid is stupid, regardless of your reasoning.

If you revel in ignorance and the rejection of basic education then surely everyone pities you since you are going to ruin your adult life, probably be unemployable, unloved and a very unhappy person!!!!!!!!!!!!

Big words like "quadripedic monothemes," come from people who are just trying to confuse you with big words. Science is about evidence, not about big words.

I don't care. You fail to produce your god.

What makes you think I care about if you are a science denier or do not care? On every level you fail. You are a science denier or you do not care but do you care about your Bible and it's words? According to your Bible you are supposed to be able to heal the sick, restore sight to blind eyes, with nothing being impossible to you but have you done any of those things, have any Christians, do not give me any anecdotal crap because if it was done to the magnitude the Bible says you can they would not go unnoticed. According to your Bible if true to it's words we shouldn't even be having this discussion because your Bible says you should be able to prove your god exist but none of you can, that disproves your Bible thus your god.

Blame their autism. Most atheists can't distinguish what is metaphorical and what is literal. Try telling an atheist a joke, just try, they will take the joke a face value. I dare you to try it.

Let's disprove the Bible with entire societies and cultures that existed before it. God put them there in your eyes. Was he wrong in doing so, and why correct it with the Old Testaments, then Jesus, then the new Testament, then Catholics, then Anglicans, then........ Is God saying that Christianity now replaces all the races and cultures and Gods that I put here before Jesus? And I want a multitude of Christian faiths to exist with a multitude of other faiths and have you fight it out? Why like this God?

No, but Christians have a difficult time distinguishing between proof of God's existence and no proof of God's existence. Until they can come up with that proof, none of that what is in your question really matters.