Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and the Yahoo Answers website is now in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.

?
Lv 5
? asked in Politics & GovernmentMilitary · 7 years ago

In the US army, why do Regular ranks co-exist with wartime/ conscription ranks?

Many figures in US military history had parallel ranks, like Custer with rank of Brigadier but remaining Lieutenant Colonel as a regular rank, why did officers retain separate ranks during wartime? Should an officer that has performed well during a war tour deserve a promotion in his "regular" rank?

5 Answers

Relevance
  • 7 years ago

    It's called frocking and is still practiced to this day in all of the military services. It has nothing to do with wartime service per se.

    An officer selected for promotion, particularly to the flag ranks (Generals and Admirals) will be permitted to pin on the new rank insignia prior to the actual promotion effective date which may be as much as a year away from the promotion announcement date. It's less common for an O-5 to be frocked to O-6, but I've personally seen it happen.

    Additionally, reserve officers often have a permanent rank and a temporary rank. I've known several Brigadier Generals (O-7) whose permanent grade was Lieutenant Colonel (O-5) or Colonel (O-6) and several Major Generals (O-8) whose permanent grade was Colonel or Brigadier General. This practice is one way around flag officer manning levels imposed by Congress as the permanent rank is what counts for manpower purposes. If an officer retires while holding a higher temporary rank than permanent rank, he will normally retire at the permanent rank.

    As an aside, Custer was not particularly successful as an officer. He and his entire unit were annihilated in a campaign that the average Lieutenant would have seen as futile. Heck, the average Private would know that disaster was the only likely outcome.

    Source(s): Retired First Sergeant
  • ?
    Lv 7
    7 years ago

    That was during a time when the Army of the United States and the US Army were different components of the same service.

    Army of the US commissions were temporary as that component used to only exist during wartime. Whereas US Army commissions were your actual rank. It was possible (as in with Custer) to hold seperate commissions in both with different ranks

    Source(s): US Army Scout
  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    that was the policy at the time.

    "Should an officer that has performed well during a war tour deserve a promotion in his "regular" rank? " they often did - see U.S. Grant for example.

  • 7 years ago

    Not applicable to 2014. System changed a century ago.

  • Anonymous
    7 years ago

    Of course, then again in places like Switzerland nobody can become a general except in war time then loose the title after war time. One problem is reservist and regular ranks seem to be two different titles, Someone can be a General in the National Guard but if attained another lower rank in the main services apparently still get's used that title in D.O.D communications from what I have gathered.

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.